Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 26 Nov 2012 13:48:26 +0000
From:      Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>
Cc:        svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, Alex Kozlov <ak@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r307766 - head/sysutils/salt
Message-ID:  <20121126134826.GB62928@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1211261311390.2085@tuna.site>
References:  <201211260604.qAQ649wY012225@svn.freebsd.org> <20121126061719.GC24378@FreeBSD.org> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1211261311390.2085@tuna.site>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 01:12:25PM +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Nov 2012, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> >> -WWW:	http://saltstack.org
> >> +WWW: http://saltstack.org
> > 
> > Actually, it should be terminated with a slash as well.
> 
> Why?  http RFCs have clarified for more than a decade that the
> presence or absence of a slash does not make a difference here.

Purely aesthetics reasons (and consistency with most of the other ports
descriptions).

./danfe



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20121126134826.GB62928>