Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 13:48:26 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, Alex Kozlov <ak@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r307766 - head/sysutils/salt Message-ID: <20121126134826.GB62928@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1211261311390.2085@tuna.site> References: <201211260604.qAQ649wY012225@svn.freebsd.org> <20121126061719.GC24378@FreeBSD.org> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1211261311390.2085@tuna.site>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 01:12:25PM +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Mon, 26 Nov 2012, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > >> -WWW: http://saltstack.org > >> +WWW: http://saltstack.org > > > > Actually, it should be terminated with a slash as well. > > Why? http RFCs have clarified for more than a decade that the > presence or absence of a slash does not make a difference here. Purely aesthetics reasons (and consistency with most of the other ports descriptions). ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20121126134826.GB62928>