Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 02:58:09 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group <Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: was: Bringing LPRng into FreeBSD? Message-ID: <20000626025809.G14265@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <39545167.AE635015@softweyr.com>; from wes@softweyr.com on Sat, Jun 24, 2000 at 12:12:55AM -0600 References: <17253.961705123@localhost> <200006222046.e5MKkKn07168@cwsys.cwsent.com> <20000622235602.A1088@kilt.nothing-going-on.org> <39545167.AE635015@softweyr.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jun 24, 2000 at 12:12:55AM -0600, Wes Peters wrote: > Yes, it is wrong. If it must be linked with GNU gettext, no matter > what their license is, the resulting executable has been infected > with the GPL virus. Binutils and GCC are the same. We just configure them with no NLS support and then gettext is not needed. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000626025809.G14265>