Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 18:17:39 -0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?IkRhbnRlIEYuIEIuIENvbMOyIg==?= <dante01010@gmail.com> To: Jon Radel <jon@radel.com>, freeBSD <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Static routing Message-ID: <54626EE3.2060308@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <545BEA8A.9070607@radel.com> References: <545BE713.9090705@gmail.com> <545BEA8A.9070607@radel.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello Jon
I don't have so much experience with bridges, i'm not asking you to tell
how to setup , i''ll take a look at freebsd bridge related docs and
something other stuff, but could you give me a brief of how would it
work here ? . Thank you for your response.
Regards
+-------+
| Cisco |
+-----+-+
|if: 189.92.72.0/29
|
|em0: 189.92.72.10/255.255.255.248
+-+-------+
| FreeBSD |
+-+-------+
|em1: 189.92.72.11/255.255.255.248
|
|
+-----+--+
| Switch | +-----------------+
+--------+ | MAIL |
|---------------+-----------------+
bnx0: 189.72.92.12/255.255.255.248
On 11/6/14 7:39 PM, Jon Radel wrote:
> On 11/6/14, 4:24 PM, "Dante F. B. Colò" wrote:
>> Hello everyone
>>
>> I'm trying to setup some static routes on a freebsd box for some
>> public addresses , the machine has two ethernet cards *em0 *and *em1
>> ***, *em0* is attached to a Cisco internet router and *em1* is
>> connected to a switch, both interfaces have public addresses of the
>> same range , *em1 *appears has absolutely no communication
> It would be helpful if you provided the specific IP addresses you're
> talking about, complete with the masks, and specific commands you
> enter, or conf file lines you add or modify. For starters, when you
> talk about "both interfaces have public addresses of the same range"
> that's not a precise enough description for me to know if you mean two
> addresses on the same subnet or two addresses, each in different
> subnets (though they may be adjacent or part of the same larger
> network). If you do, in fact, mean two addresses in the same network,
> then your IP topology is broken if you think you can do layer 3
> routing between them, and the very first thing you'll need to do is
> come up with a legal addressing scheme. (Or consider layer 2
> bridging, which has other design implications of its own but might
> work better for you....)
>
>
>> , i took a look at the static routes and there is a route for the
>> subnet that it goes to *em0* , i'm trying to add a static route for
>> the ip address pointing to the***em1 *without pass gateway using
>> *-iface* parameter but always returns "Network unreachble",
> Something is confused, so it would be better to give us the output
> you're looking at rather than your interpretation of that output.
>
> Not to say that somebody else may not be able to figure out precisely
> what's going on based on this description, but I'm much more likely to
> spot what's going wrong with specific information: actual configs;
> actual output.
>
> --Jon Radel
> jon@radel.com
>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?54626EE3.2060308>