Date: Wed, 22 May 1996 13:13:09 -0400 (EDT) From: "Charles C. Figueiredo" <marxx@apocalypse.superlink.net> To: "Brett L. Hawn" <blh@nol.net> Cc: Paul Traina <pst@Shockwave.COM>, Garrett Wollman <wollman@lcs.mit.edu>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.tfs.com>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: freebsd + synfloods + ip spoofing Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960522131211.3698C-100000@apocalypse.superlink.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.3.93.960522154725.13907A-100000@dazed.nol.net>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Wed, 22 May 1996, Brett L. Hawn wrote: > On Wed, 22 May 1996, Charles C. Figueiredo wrote: > > > You may be right, but other implementations don't randomize on every > > connection either. FreeBSD, at the moment, just has what other > > implementations have wrong. > > > > So we're to say 'well, they're wrong so its ok for us to be' ? I think not > > Brett > > Of course not! The only point I was touching on, is the fact that you were wrong in making FreeBSD's implementation seem archaic and extremely insecure in comparison to others. Which it isn't. Marxxhome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.960522131211.3698C-100000>
