Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 01:57:36 +0300 (IDT) From: Nadav Eiron <nadav@cs.Technion.AC.IL> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org, Jason Andresen <jandrese@mitre.org> Subject: Re: technical comparison Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.95-heb-2.07.1010523015714.26844A-100000@csd> In-Reply-To: <20010522144728.B29988@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I didn't, but I believe Jason's numbers (for ext2 and ufs) also had write caching only enabled on Linux. On Tue, 22 May 2001, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 10:27:27PM +0300, Nadav Eiron wrote: > > I ran tests that I think are similar to what Jason ran on identically > > configured FreeBSD and Linux/ReiserFS machines. ResierFS is much much > > faster than UFS+softupdates on these tests. > > > > Linux (2.2.14-5 + ReiserFS): > > Time: > > 164 seconds total > > 97 seconds of transactions (103 per second) > > > > Files: > > 65052 created (396 per second) > > Creation alone: 60000 files (1090 per second) > > Mixed with transactions: 5052 files (52 per second) > > 4936 read (50 per second) > > 5063 appended (52 per second) > > 65052 deleted (396 per second) > > Deletion alone: 60104 files (5008 per second) > > Mixed with transactions: 4948 files (51 per second) > > > > Data: > > 24.83 megabytes read (155.01 kilobytes per second) > > 336.87 megabytes written (2.05 megabytes per second) > > > > FreeBSD 4.3-RELEASE (ufs/softupdates): > > Did you enable write caching? You didn't mention, and it's off by > default in 4.3, but I think enabled by default on Linux. > > Kris > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.3.95-heb-2.07.1010523015714.26844A-100000>