Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 17:30:06 -0600 From: Ade Lovett <ade@lovett.com> To: Mikhail Teterin <mi@aldan.algebra.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/12739: New port: AT&T's DjVu Netscape plug-in Message-ID: <20000328173006.N69223@lovett.com> In-Reply-To: <200003282321.SAA04202@xxx.video-collage.com>; from mi@video-collage.com on Tue, Mar 28, 2000 at 06:21:06PM -0500 References: <20000328170640.M69223@lovett.com> <200003282321.SAA04202@xxx.video-collage.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Mar 28, 2000 at 06:21:06PM -0500, mi@video-collage.com wrote:
>
> Well, if I harcode MOZILLA_HOME as ${LOCALBASE}/lib/netscape, there is
> no problem. But I did not want to do that...
Hmm.. there's also:
viper 415# make fetch
>> npdjvu-freebsd.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist on this system.
>> Attempting to fetch from http://www.djvu.att.com/download/plugin/.
fetch: npdjvu-freebsd.tar.gz: www.djvu.att.com: HTTP server returned error code 404
I believe I already mentioned that the site was moved to www.djvu.com
> = I'd strongly recommend installing devel/portlint and using it to clean
> = things up before submission.
>
> I used it:
Looks like you missed some flags.. as a rule, I tend to use:
portlint -abcNv
which gives a better idea of any issues.
> I put the "TAR?=tar" and "LN?=ln" in there on purpose, because I tested
> this port on an old 2.2.8 machine with old bsd.port.mk. The two other
> warnings are bogus too -- one is there because of quotes around
> ${MOZILLA_HOME} (what if it has spaces in it?) and the other is because
> RUN_DEPENDS lists ${MOZILLA_HOME}.
My (possibly incorrect) understanding is that support for both 2.x
and aout 3.x has ceased.
> I'm sure I'm not. With the NO_CDROM/NO_PACKAGE we are not even a party
> of the license agreement... This way the port is not interactive, which
> is good, is not it?...
My understanding of the license agreement is that it needs to be
presented to, and accepted by, the end user, before proceeding.
Usual disclaimers about not being a lawyer apply, but the fact that
you have a bunch of comments in there suggest that you thought about
this enough to put them in. If it's not a problem, why have the
comments at all, since most people won't be reading the Makefile
anyway.
-aDe
--
Ade Lovett, Austin, TX.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000328173006.N69223>