Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 08:55:31 -0700 From: Alan Somers <asomers@freebsd.org> To: rgrimes@freebsd.org Cc: src-committers <src-committers@freebsd.org>, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r330696 - in head/libexec/tftpd: . tests Message-ID: <CAOtMX2hq8AeKvV0eej%2BwszOW-5kiSjVB981Lso-i1TyiHhAaCA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201803091552.w29FqAWo065077@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> References: <201803091530.w29FUKin041283@repo.freebsd.org> <201803091552.w29FqAWo065077@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 8:52 AM, Rodney W. Grimes < freebsd@pdx.rh.cn85.dnsmgr.net> wrote: > > Author: asomers > > Date: Fri Mar 9 15:30:20 2018 > > New Revision: 330696 > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/330696 > > > > Log: > > Add some functional tests for tftpd(8) > > > > tftpd(8) is difficult to test in isolation due to its relationship with > > inetd. Create a test program that mimics the behavior of tftp(1) and > > inetd(8) and verifies tftpd's response in several different scenarios. > > At one time I thought it was possible to run all of the external "inetd" > daemons as standalone daemons without inetd involved. > I do not recall if tftpd was included in that, but believe it was. > I am sure that telnetd and ftpd would run standalone. > > Have we lost some useful functionality here that maybe we want back? > Some daemons support that, but others don't. It's not in common code. sprayd and ftpd can do it. It looks like telnetd cannot. I'm not sure which others can. -Alan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAOtMX2hq8AeKvV0eej%2BwszOW-5kiSjVB981Lso-i1TyiHhAaCA>