Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 13:45:31 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> To: Dag-Erling =?utf-8?B?U23DuHJncmF2?= <des@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Dragonfly Mail Agent (dma) in the base system Message-ID: <20220131124531.aoc7lowc3f7vyjaf@aniel.nours.eu> In-Reply-To: <86czk8rhcd.fsf@next.des.no> References: <CAPyFy2Cu-TJk5zkJ5qGgJa62b7BVE__Hv2huM-f-ALzxo9AiQw@mail.gmail.com> <86czk8rhcd.fsf@next.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 11:25:54PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org> writes: > > I am interested in determining whether dma is a viable minimal base > > system MTA, and if not what gaps remain. > > It cannot. Ask bapt@ who was the one to import it, and later abandon > the idea of making it our default MTA. The reason was that it does not > have a default domain setting, so it cannot handle email from cron, > periodic etc. where the recipient is just a user name (usually “root”), > and the devs were not willing to add that feature. I have email as far > back as 2015 on the subject. > This has been fixed since. (not by me) Bapt
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20220131124531.aoc7lowc3f7vyjaf>