Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 14:42:25 -0700 From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> Cc: Marc UBM Bocklet <ubm@u-boot-man.de> Subject: Re: [BETA7-panic] sodealloc(): so_count 1 Message-ID: <4172E741.7080508@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1041017172404.29749C-100000@fledge.watson.org> References: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1041017172404.29749C-100000@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I.e., it sounds like a > reference count issue due to sockets using a slightly aberrant reference > model. I'll try to come up with a workaround sometime in the next 12-24 > hours, and hopefully also a proper fix. > > Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects > robert@fledge.watson.org Principal Research Scientist, McAfee Research At the risk of sounding like a broken record, if we had a central policy on how reference counts were done, and library/include support for doing it we would be some distance ahead fo where we are now.. There are too many examples of "aberrant reference model".
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4172E741.7080508>