Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 14:42:25 -0700 From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> Cc: Marc UBM Bocklet <ubm@u-boot-man.de> Subject: Re: [BETA7-panic] sodealloc(): so_count 1 Message-ID: <4172E741.7080508@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1041017172404.29749C-100000@fledge.watson.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
I.e., it sounds like a > reference count issue due to sockets using a slightly aberrant reference > model. I'll try to come up with a workaround sometime in the next 12-24 > hours, and hopefully also a proper fix. > > Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects > robert@fledge.watson.org Principal Research Scientist, McAfee Research At the risk of sounding like a broken record, if we had a central policy on how reference counts were done, and library/include support for doing it we would be some distance ahead fo where we are now.. There are too many examples of "aberrant reference model".home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4172E741.7080508>