Date: Sat, 2 Jan 1999 17:54:02 -0500 (EST) From: "John W. DeBoskey" <jwd@unx.sas.com> To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: make release (almost) disklabel failure Message-ID: <199901022254.RAA04176@bb01f39.unx.sas.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,
Well, make release almost made it...
Compressing doc files...
sh -e /usr/src/release/scripts/doFS.sh /R/stage /mnt 1440 /R/stage/mfsfd 8000 minimum
disklabel: /R/stage/trees/bin/usr/mdec/fdboot: No such file or directory
*** Error code 4
Stop.
This appears to be from the following in doFS.sh:
if [ "`uname -m`" = "alpha" ]; then
disklabel -Brw -b ${RD}/trees/bin/usr/mdec/boot1 \
/dev/r${VNDEVICE} ${FSLABEL}
else
disklabel -Brw \
-b ${RD}/trees/bin/usr/mdec/fdboot \
-s ${RD}/trees/bin/usr/mdec/bootfd \
/dev/r${VNDEVICE} ${FSLABEL}
fi
However, ls ${RD}/trees/bin/usr/mdec reveals:
boot1 cdboot nb3c509.com nb8390.com rawboot
boot2 fbsdboot.exe nb3c509.rom nb8390.rom
So my question... Should we still be building fdboot & bootfd, or
does doFS.sh need to be updated to use boot1 & boot2 for x86? From
previous messages in -current, I think doFS.sh is out-of-date...
Thanks!
John
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199901022254.RAA04176>