Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2002 21:02:51 -0800 From: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> To: Chris Faulhaber <jedgar@fxp.org> Cc: Patrick Gardella <patrick@FreeBSD.ORG>, Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>, scottl@FreeBSD.ORG, smp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: P5 vs. SMP, part 2 Message-ID: <3C3A7D7B.AB4E0A92@mindspring.com> References: <20020107120621.GA23585@darkstar.doublethink.cx> <20020107235035.95C263808@overcee.netplex.com.au> <20020108000825.GA60374@peitho.fxp.org> <3C3A3EB0.548F0F59@mindspring.com> <20020107164853.A325@toyland.drapple.com> <20020108005545.GA2736@peitho.fxp.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Chris Faulhaber wrote: > > > > I wonder how many dual P5's are still being used :/ > > > There's at least you, Gunnar, Me, and (if he finds the parts), > > > Peter. > > I use a dual P5 (200) as my primary home development system. Besides > > the MB, its very easy to find parts for. > > I assume, as we move farther off topic, that you guys haven't > seen any significant slowdowns with your dual P5's with 4.x > after mid-June? I haven't loaded a -current that recently; it's not stable enough to do real work, unfortunately. I can load it, if I can get to Fry's for another disk to burn; I rather expect to see it be slower... -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3C3A7D7B.AB4E0A92>