Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 13:40:46 -0500 From: Marco Muskus <marcomuskus@une.net.co> To: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: compare zfs xfs and jfs o Message-ID: <5021612E.9070804@une.net.co> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1208060110130.2396@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <CAFBRBcoxr5HLVipX5L5=qhEZ7pOW%2B4NmWJwy3GsL_DH74Fm%2ByQ@mail.gmail.com> <501D8A3D.1000707@une.net.co> <20120805162915.GB5028@hemlock.hydra> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1208052003030.94918@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <501EE348.9020609@une.net.co> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1208060110130.2396@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
El 05/08/12 18:10, Wojciech Puchar escribió: >>> really - stick with FreeBSD UFS. it is really best. >> >> Yes UFS is very good, but very hight IO ZFS is fastest if you use >> L2ARC/ZIL on SSD. > if... > > better just move heavy used things on SSD and rest on HDD. really it's > fastest. > > > Yes, you can do that ... until the SSD is full
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5021612E.9070804>