Date: Sun, 24 Sep 1995 15:05:28 -0700 (PDT) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@GndRsh.aac.dev.com> To: terry@lambert.org (Terry Lambert) Cc: fenner@parc.xerox.com, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kernel versions and config's rm -rf Message-ID: <199509242205.PAA01453@GndRsh.aac.dev.com> In-Reply-To: <199509242141.OAA03933@phaeton.artisoft.com> from "Terry Lambert" at Sep 24, 95 02:41:08 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>
> > > Instead of "rm -rf", maybe config could just do "make clean; rm *.h Makefile",
> > > to keep the "version" file around?
> >
> > I like this, it is far more appropriate than an rm -rf, but should be
> > reduced even further to just ``make clean; rm *.h'' and
> > the clean: target had better do the right things.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > No need to rm the Makefile, config is going
> > to overwrite it anyway. I can see the reasoning for rm *.h, as config and
> > or files{,.i386} may have changed and not rewrite all the same .h files :-(.
>
> You are both forgetting minor issues.
I think I covered your minor issue below quite well above.
>
> Like vnode_if.c and syscalls.c.
>
--
Rod Grimes rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com
Accurate Automation Company Reliable computers for FreeBSD
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199509242205.PAA01453>