Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 16 Apr 1998 20:37:56 +0100
From:      Karl Pielorz <kpielorz@tdx.co.uk>
To:        Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>
Cc:        current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Should I run -CURRENT? SNAP?
Message-ID:  <35365E14.BD1F9D21@tdx.co.uk>
References:  <199804161842.LAA00669@dingo.cdrom.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mike Smith wrote:
 
> -current right now seems to be quite stable.

Yes, I haven't seen too many complaints recently... (Did I say complaints? -
I mean't 'bug information'... :-)
 
> > If I find a SNAP that works well is it likely to stay 'working well' (I
> > know, how longs a piece of string?) - or am I better off staying 'really'
> > current?
> 
> I tend to leapfrog; when I have a stable system I'll live with it until
> either I need/want to play with a new feature, or it just feels "really
> old" (usually 2-3 months).

Sounds like a good strategy... I like the 'play' word in there... <g>
 
> > Oh for SMP-Stable... <g>
> 
> Testing and input from people like you is what it will take to achieve
> just exactly that.

I guess so... I've just freed up a wedge of space on another 1Gb drive - and
I'm about to install it...

Thanks for your advice (to both my postings! - memory mapped IO?) <G>

Regards,

Karl

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?35365E14.BD1F9D21>