Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 17 Feb 2005 15:39:57 -0800
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        P?sztor Rich?rd <ricsip@mailbox.hu>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Managing bad sectors during install
Message-ID:  <20050217233957.GA19205@xor.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <6.1.2.0.2.20050217230346.02725a48@mailbox.hu>
References:  <6.1.2.0.2.20050217230346.02725a48@mailbox.hu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 11:09:12PM +0100, P?sztor Rich?rd wrote:
> I think this 8,4 quantum is old enough to not contain so called "spare=20
> sectors". So 1 bad sector means there is really only 1 bad
> sector. Anyway i still cant understand, why UFS cant cope with bad blocks=
,=20
> but 1000 year old FAT, or the newer NTFS
> can easyli get through the  problem.

There didn't seem to be a question there.

> The other problem: how should i mount "/" read-only, because i always get=
=20
> "busy" error-message?

When you do what, exactly?

Kris

--d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFCFStMWry0BWjoQKURAgTsAKDP0VkiIBmhzs7LDohhfzGeBQQVBwCffh9k
NZEFr2hx51msy2SNahQNA7Y=
=4l4e
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050217233957.GA19205>