Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 25 Aug 2006 21:05:04 +0200
From:      Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org>
To:        "Devon H. O'Dell" <devon.odell@coyotepoint.com>
Cc:        doc@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Fix for ithread.9
Message-ID:  <1156532704.8612.2.camel@ikaros.oook.cz>
In-Reply-To: <44EF355D.5050208@coyotepoint.com>
References:  <44EF355D.5050208@coyotepoint.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

[-- Attachment #1 --]
Devon H. O'Dell píše v pá 25. 08. 2006 v 13:37 -0400:

> I was discussing UMA with Robert Watson yesterday; specifically its 
> usage implications in an interrupt context. He suggested adding some 
> information to ithread(9) specifying semantics for memory allocation in 
> an interrupt context. So I came up with this tiny patch, shot it jhb@'s 
> way, he reviewed it and told me to shoot it this way.
> 
> So here it is, apparently ready to be committed.

Applied, thanks!

-- 
Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz>
              <pav@FreeBSD.org>

I cannot be responsible for future messages as apparently my cats have
learned to type.

[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBE70ngntdYP8FOsoIRAov5AKC1blPSv1+V6eWcdARbXF5DEFcY6wCgy78o
FkO28MRemZXaMiWJgzkEIGQ=
=HWG3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1156532704.8612.2.camel>