Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 20 Mar 2019 16:06:21 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 236574] Make FreeBSD kernel configuration more flexible
Message-ID:  <bug-236574-227-ZW6KIkXsK6@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-236574-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-236574-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D236574

Mark Johnston <markj@FreeBSD.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |Not A Bug
             Status|New                         |Closed
                 CC|                            |markj@FreeBSD.org

--- Comment #3 from Mark Johnston <markj@FreeBSD.org> ---
This bug report is too vague to be actionable.  There is a maintenance cost=
 in
having kernel components be optional, and sometimes it simply doesn't make
sense to do so when the component is tightly coupled with the rest of the
kernel.  Jails are an example of this, and you didn't list any others.

Please post to a mailing list (-questions or -hackers perhaps) and clearly
state what it is you're trying to achieve.  It may be possible to do what y=
ou
want without modifying the kernel.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-236574-227-ZW6KIkXsK6>