Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 13:24:29 +0100 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: heasley <heas@shrubbery.net> Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fbsd11 & sshv1 Message-ID: <867f5bfmde.fsf@desk.des.no> In-Reply-To: <20170130195226.GD73060@shrubbery.net> (heasley's message of "Mon, 30 Jan 2017 19:52:26 %2B0000") References: <20170127173016.GF12175@shrubbery.net> <867f5c66yr.fsf@desk.des.no> <20170130195226.GD73060@shrubbery.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
heasley <heas@shrubbery.net> writes: > Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav <des@des.no> writes: > > FreeBSD 10 supports SSHv1 and will continue to do so. FreeBSD 11 > > and 12 do not, and neither does the openssh-portable port. I'm > > afraid you will have to find some other SSH client. > That is sad; You know what would be even sadder? If the OpenSSH developers had to continue to devote significant resources to maintaining a rat's nest of legacy code so 0.0001% of their users could continue to use an obsolete protocol to connect to obsolete equipment, instead of devoting those same resources to developing new features and improving existing ones. Especially when those users have plenty of alternatives to choose from, including but not limited to security/putty. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?867f5bfmde.fsf>