Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 09:40:24 +0100 From: Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net> To: Weongyo Jeong <weongyo@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org, Jung-uk Kim <jkim@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: [RFC] USBdump patches Message-ID: <201011240940.24333.hselasky@c2i.net> In-Reply-To: <201011240848.58463.hselasky@c2i.net> References: <AANLkTinaUNi3FGRiOkeTN2FKx3ybqE=F3W6%2BsV8qVCTf@mail.gmail.com> <20101124001832.GI92881@weongyo> <201011240848.58463.hselasky@c2i.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday 24 November 2010 08:48:58 Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > I think that to be really useful the BPF code needs some additional > information through additional misc. instructions to orientate about the > data it is getting from USB. For example the frame number, state for > control transfers and endpoint number. Another idea is to prepend this information into a fixed sized header which is "virtually" prepended to the data. --HPS
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201011240940.24333.hselasky>