Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 18:38:41 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> To: Rui Paulo <rpaulo@felyko.com> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Subject: Re: svn commit: r262282 - in head: contrib/dma contrib/dma/debian contrib/dma/debian/migrate contrib/dma/debian/source contrib/dma/test etc/mtree libexec libexec/dma share/mk tools/build/mk tools/build... Message-ID: <20140221173841.GK1699@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <CDC410B6-6B76-4DA1-8630-C461B368E046@felyko.com> References: <201402210726.s1L7QnBP007144@svn.freebsd.org> <20140221160144.GA61609@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20140221163217.GJ1699@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <CDC410B6-6B76-4DA1-8630-C461B368E046@felyko.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 09:07:23AM -0800, Rui Paulo wrote: > On 21 Feb 2014, at 08:32, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 08:01:44AM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > >> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 07:26:49AM +0000, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > >>> Author: bapt > >>> Date: Fri Feb 21 07:26:49 2014 > >>> New Revision: 262282 > >>> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/262282 > >>> > >>> Log: > >>> Import Dragonfly Mail Agent into base system > >>> > >>> It is a small and lightweight Mail Transport Agent. > >>> It accepts mails from locally installed Mail User Agents (MUA) and delivers the > >>> mails either locally or to a remote destination. Remote delivery includes > >>> several features like TLS/SSL support, SMTP authentication and NULLCLIENT. > >>> > >>> Make dma conditional to new WITHOUT_DMA option and make it respect WITHOUT_MAIL > >>> > >>> Reviewed by: peter > >>> Discussed with: emaste, bz, peter > >> > >> Why? There is /usr/ports/mail/dma. > >> > > Because there are lot of case where you do not need a full smtp server in base but just > > be able to deliver locally and/or relay mails outside, dma is very good for that > > purpose. > > I agree with this notion and to be honest the next step should be to remove sendmail from the base system. > I'm strongly support that idea. regards, Bapt [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlMHjyEACgkQ8kTtMUmk6Ew8+wCfVs8pAcMtohktzHe1ZY6lJQOU VJ0AoJ7vP+LUnMotz4fRqehCeWqH/hWg =DM3m -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140221173841.GK1699>