Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 25 Aug 2018 01:27:14 -0700
From:      Matthew Macy <mmacy@freebsd.org>
To:        gurenchan@gmail.com
Cc:        Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>, Ali <aliovx@gmail.com>,  freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: drm / drm2 removal in 12
Message-ID:  <CAPrugNqsqQds6tBzeQcA%2B5tD4xh%2Bi1Fef2ta8Qjf5E6LTxPq4Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALM2mEmJVqfeERTL4AWw7cY3YfPUY6TFw==1hzBqsDJNDde_Uw@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CAPrugNr9wN63ANjTYzyrHRegr9KTk_OSTLfrt%2BhktCnfKX=_mg@mail.gmail.com> <20180824215302.ivfna55jtrtc5trg@freebsd480.station> <CAPrugNqV6k2QTuiLerAKLB_hV1hkZNi4MLNqKU7MtVnMhMfPQw@mail.gmail.com> <CANCZdfp2rf=5e-qTV=-4yFrLPugn0UhtYovXdesJWbRWAjdGTg@mail.gmail.com> <CALM2mEmJVqfeERTL4AWw7cY3YfPUY6TFw==1hzBqsDJNDde_Uw@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Owen -
I understand that you're enthusiastic and you just want what's best for the
project. However, there's a couple of points I hope you'll take to heart.
First, please read what you sent and think about the tone and word choice.
It's extremely negative and critical - you're actively alienating people on
the list. You're not going to be successful engaging any open source
community or workplace if you choose to communicate like this. Second, this
is a volunteer project. One needs to establish a track record of producing
patches and working with developers to get them committed. Regardless of
how sound your technical position is - you're going to have a hard time
being acknowledged if there is no contribution to match.

Best wishes.
-M


On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 4:07 PM blubee blubeeme <gurenchan@gmail.com> wrote=
:

>
>
> On Sat, Aug 25, 2018 at 6:26 AM Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 4:20 PM Matthew Macy <mmacy@freebsd.org> wrote:
>>
>> > On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 14:53 Ali <aliovx@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 06:54:54PM -0700, Matthew Macy wrote:
>> > > > Just in case anyone misses the change to UPDATING:
>> > > >
>> > > > 20180821:
>> > > >         drm and drm2 have been removed. Users on powerpc, 32-bit
>> > > hardware,
>> > > >         or with GPUs predating Radeon and i915 will need to instal=
l
>> the
>> > > >         graphics/drm-legacy-kmod. All other users should be able t=
o
>> use
>> > > >         one of the LinuxKPI-based ports: graphics/drm-stable-kmod,
>> > > >         graphics/drm-next-kmod, graphics/drm-devel-kmod.
>> > > > Note that this applies only to 12.
>> > >
>> > > I see that The removal of drm and drm2 has been reverted on svn. Cou=
ld
>> > > you please kindly share the reasons behind the re-inclusion?
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> > I can=E2=80=99t really give the blow by blow of internal project drama=
, but the
>> > gist of it is that =E2=80=9Cbest practices=E2=80=9D (which are not yet=
 actually
>> documented
>> > anywhere that I=E2=80=99ve seen) were not followed with regards to the
>> deprecation
>> > process. Warner and others believe that we can address the objectives =
of
>> > the drm removal (improving the user experience and communicating that
>> > drm/drm2 are _completely_ unsupported apart from continuing to compile=
)
>> > through less disruptive means.
>> >
>>
>> Just so.
>>
>> Our only continued frustration is that we were never given any guidance =
by
>> > RE or core on said =E2=80=9Cbest practices=E2=80=9D when the discussio=
n was taking
>> place in
>> > May and then those groups behaved as if this were a surprise when the
>> > removal happened. I=E2=80=99m cautiously optimistic that this well exp=
edite
>> > improving communications on those matters.
>> >
>>
>> All the problems that are exposed by this aren't technical. This one is
>> social, but no less important.
>>
>> Warner
>> _______________________________________________
>> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.or=
g
>> "
>>
>
> I've been watching this debacle for quite some time now and I'd just like
> to ask why the rush?
>
> The graphics team is working very hard to destroy the stability of FreeBS=
D
> just so that they can force their uncooked work down users throats.
>
> The Linuxkpi is unstable at best, alpha level software that's constantly
> in need of someone to go and fix something on FreeBSD because Linux devs
> decided to make some changes or implement a new feature.
>
> This project: https://wiki.freebsd.org/Use%20linuxkpi%20in%20DRM
> Goals
>
>    - Move DRM headers to a similar location as Linux
>    -
>
>    Use kmalloc() instead of malloc(9)
>    - Use kref
>    -
>
>    Use idr and get rid of drm_gem_names.c
>    - Use PCI API
>    - Use Linux locking primitives
>
> is garbage, if you want to use develop Linux code and use Linux then go d=
o
> that on Linux.
>
> Are these guys insane and please avoid the nonsense about you're doing
> this in your spare time.
>
> If you cannot devote the resources to do something right then don't do it
> at all.
>
> Keep that stuff in to yourself or anyone crazy enough to follow those
> steps to get it up and running, you guys cannot expect to contaminate the
> entire FreeBSD project for this mess.
>
> This is nonsense and I hope that more people who see it as such would say
> so and stop having these guys forcing this crap; it's maintenance hell wh=
o
> will maintain it if they decide to leave?
>
> Best,
> Owen
>
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAPrugNqsqQds6tBzeQcA%2B5tD4xh%2Bi1Fef2ta8Qjf5E6LTxPq4Q>