Date: Fri, 25 Jul 1997 12:09:33 +0800 (TSD) From: "Victor A. Sudakov" <vas@vas.tomsk.su> To: isp@freebsd.org (freebsd isp mailing list) Subject: Re: FreeBSD and NT Message-ID: <199707250409.MAA05435@vas.tomsk.su> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95.970723124444.1813C-100000@dylan.visint.co.uk> from "Stephen Roome" at "Jul 23, 97 01:03:16 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Stephen Roome wrote: [...] > > However if the arguments against UNIX are true then all it means are that > you will need a competent intelligent sysadmin. > > So, really all the arguments so far in favour of NT seem to be about the > competence required to use NT vs. the competence required to use UNIX. [...] > look at the arguments the NT side is fighting mainly on the premise of > "we're too stupid to use UNIX". [...] I have a friend sysadmin who is familiar both with UNIX and NT and he says that NT is easy to use only until you do not have to do anything advanced. If you have to do something more complicated you need a lot of NT-specific training and special competence. Perhaps, NT is really an excellent platform for a secretary to run MS Office though. -- Victor Sudakov http://www.tomsk.su/r/persons/vas.htm
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199707250409.MAA05435>