Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 13:43:12 -0400 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Cc: Mike Jakubik <mikej@rogers.com>, stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Still getting 'calcru: runtime went backwards' Message-ID: <200607071343.14205.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <44ADC08B.8000408@rogers.com> References: <20060629193346.GA2548@dragon.NUXI.org> <44AD6756.4070008@rogers.com> <44ADC08B.8000408@rogers.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday 06 July 2006 22:01, Mike Jakubik wrote: > I'm getting a ton of them now, and i found a way to reproduce them. > Basically i run a compile session in one terminal, say make buildkernel, > and run top in another. As soon as i run top, the messages appear, and > they seem to be synchronized with the refresh rate of top, 2 messages > per refresh. This is on a 6.1-STABLE as of today. That is partly because when you run top it queries the resource usage of the various processes via fill_kinfo_proc(). When you don't run top, no one is asking for the resource usage numbers, so the kernel doesn't waste time calculating them. > --- > calcru: negative runtime of -261273 usec for pid 12 (swi4: clock) > calcru: negative runtime of -261273 usec for pid 12 (swi4: clock) > calcru: negative runtime of -259691 usec for pid 12 (swi4: clock) > ... In both cases your errors are for a long-running kernel process that's been up since boot. What's the uptime on your box? -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200607071343.14205.jhb>