Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 20:24:00 +0400 From: Roman Bogorodskiy <novel@FreeBSD.org> To: Jeff Roberson <jroberson@chesapeake.net> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: SCHED_ULE on desktop system Message-ID: <20070917162400.GA42669@underworld.novel.ru> In-Reply-To: <20070917044351.GA17565@underworld.novel.ru> References: <20070916061932.GA93480@underworld.novel.ru> <20070915234855.G531@10.0.0.1> <20070916071421.GA1320@underworld.novel.ru> <20070916003323.U4507@10.0.0.1> <20070917044351.GA17565@underworld.novel.ru>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] Roman Bogorodskiy wrote: > Jeff Roberson wrote: > > > On Sun, 16 Sep 2007, Roman Bogorodskiy wrote: > > > >> Jeff Roberson wrote: > >> > >>> This is contrary to the experiences of many others. Can you send me your > >>> dmesg? There may be something about your particular hardware that is > >>> triggering a bug. ULE is definitely designed to be responsive on the > >>> desktop. > >> > >> Thanks for the quick answer! > >> > >> Here's my dmesg: http://people.freebsd.org/~novel/misc/dmesg.txt > > > > Roman, > > > > The enclosed patch helps things on my system, however, there are still some > > delays due to IO issues. Let me know if this helps. > > This patch seems to make my system react faster. However I need some > time to test it more carefully. It looks like it's not really so, it's still very slow under load. :( > > Thanks, > > Jeff > > > >> > >> Roman Bogorodskiy > >> > > > Roman Bogorodskiy Roman Bogorodskiy [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iQCVAwUBRu6qIIB0WzgdqspGAQIulQP/QeYKTJxwS4x6w1SNvGTzVtemrK/sO8kU E+Naj8wjWyYU1ua8UswR9ojGd2/+PQItlvWRxbDRHq4mYuBQa3ENlA1nOO8OYI4R aEDoU3WSFsHlccanQOaiV3EmUChH/tuteQpxIc/XOhqh/NTExCAA4RBU2yDI10Ds BSc5KSHShuQ= =ZDA9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070917162400.GA42669>