Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 22:11:22 +0200 From: Stefan Wessels Beljaars <stefan@maryjane.nl> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is 4.10-BETA stable? Message-ID: <200404222211.22288.stefan@maryjane.nl> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.4.58.0404221649040.8333@dave.horsfall.org> References: <Pine.BSI.4.58.0404221649040.8333@dave.horsfall.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday 22 April 2004 11:58, Dave Horsfall wrote: > I decided to take the plunge and perform my very first upgrade, from 4.7 > to (I thought) 4.9, by CVSuping RELENG_4 and "make buildworld" etc. > > Well, imagine my dismay when I was greeted with 4.10-BETA instead... > > Is this release considered stable? It isn't even mentioned on the FreeBSD > page. Or did I stuff up, and should have used RELENG_4_9_X instead? > if u use RELENG_4_10, cvsup, do a buildworld/installworld by the (hand)book, you will get 4.10-RC. > Are there any, umm, release notes for 4.10-BETA, so I can see what I'm > in for? > > -- Dave > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Stefan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200404222211.22288.stefan>