Date: 21 Jun 2002 00:32:26 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: "Sam Leffler" <sam@errno.com> Cc: <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: DIAGNOSTIC vs. INVARIANTS Message-ID: <xzp7kkt7f9h.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <124a01c2189b$72df9cd0$52557f42@errno.com> References: <124a01c2189b$72df9cd0$52557f42@errno.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Sam Leffler" <sam@errno.com> writes: > I read DIAGNOSTIC to be intended to control inclusion of code that _prints > diagnostic messages_ or similar and not code that does consistency checks. DIAGNOSTICS is also intended for consistency checks that have a significant impact on performance. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzp7kkt7f9h.fsf>