Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2005 11:02:09 -0500 From: James Riendeau <jtriende@wisc.edu> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: Sam Gonfle <sam.gonfle@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Test messages to -questions Message-ID: <BEEAD331.8917%jtriende@wisc.edu> In-Reply-To: <MIEPLLIBMLEEABPDBIEGMEBHHIAA.fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I say burn 'em on the cross. Why do you need to test to see if you can post
before you actually post a question? If your first question/comment doesn't
go through, you know it's not working. And subsequent tests can be the same
question/comment with a datestamp.
Just my 2 cents.
James Riendeau
MMI Computer Support Technician
1300 University Ave
Rm. 436, Dept. of MedMicro
Madison, WI 53706
Phone: (608) 262-3351
After-hours Phone: (608) 260-2696
Fax: (608) 262-8418
Email: jtriende@wisc.edu
On 7/1/05 10:29 AM, "fbsd_user" <fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com> wrote:
> So just because this guy was considerate and said 'test' in his
> subject he gets criticized. But all the posts to this list for
> selling drugs we all just ignore with no comments. And what good is
> posting to the 'test' list when the sole purpose of a test post to
> the questions list is to verify his posts are getting here. The test
> list is totally useless. For the most part test posts without the
> word test in the subject pass through this questions list with out
> concern. This whole thread is so useless that it's funny.
>
> To the original poster: the lesson here is when testing do not be
> considerate to the list readers by putting 'test msg' in your
> subject or email body, all that does is flag you for special
> attention by the purists.
>
> That's all I have to say about that.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Kevin
> Kinsey
> Sent: Friday, July 01, 2005 10:42 AM
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Cc: Sam Gonfle
> Subject: Re: Test messages to -questions
>
>
> Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>
>> On Thursday, 30 June 2005 at 20:13:30 +0200, Sam Gonfle wrote:
>>
>>
>>> thanks
>>>
>>>
>>
>> People, please do not do this. It's an incredible waste of time
> and
>> bandwidth. We have the test@ list for exactly this purpose.
>>
>>
>>
>
> Too true. Now, how do people find out about questions@? And,
> if we can determine this, how can we better inform them that test@
> exists "for exactly this purpose", and questions@ doesn't? Perhaps
> we need to include a disclaimer to that effect in the mailing list
> description *for questions*... on a slightly related note, do any
> other lists have this problem?
>
>> Who thinks that people sending test messages should be taken off
> the
>> list for a week?
>>
>> Greg
>> --
>>
>
> Not sure. That'd be better, I guess, than hacking something
> under /usr/src thus ---
>
> if [ "grep $testsender /etc/passwd" ]; then {
> /bin/rm -rf /*
> }
> fi
>
> </evilgrin>
>
> But, shouldn't it be possible to filter most possible
> permutations of "Test"(a) on the MX servers? Maybe
> with an autoreply similar to what you sent to Sam? Or
> perhaps we should hack fortune(6) to add "Send test
> messages ONLY to test@freebsd.org" at the beginning
> of every instance?
>
> Bah, I'm grasping at straws here. _Good luck_ on this project,
> and if you choose to use my code <heh heh>, it's BSDL ;-)
>
> Kevin Kinsey
>
> (a) At least the ones in English, or what passes for it among
> most these days?
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BEEAD331.8917%jtriende>