Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 17:02:59 -0700 From: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com> Cc: "src-committers@freebsd.org" <src-committers@freebsd.org>, "svn-src-all@freebsd.org" <svn-src-all@freebsd.org>, "svn-src-head@freebsd.org" <svn-src-head@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r300854 - in head/sys: netinet netinet6 Message-ID: <20160528000259.GY58287@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-VmokZZM-akvT6ZH=MuFjA0RdqpRd3Vf79-ssRBpkKk5MLRw@mail.gmail.com> References: <201605271731.u4RHV2oW071581@repo.freebsd.org> <CAJ-VmokZZM-akvT6ZH=MuFjA0RdqpRd3Vf79-ssRBpkKk5MLRw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 02:27:45PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: A> Hm, doesnt this make sense to do as part of RO_RTFREE? I agree that it looks messy, but for now we just need to fix instapanic. I will either return to this, or may be melifaro's new routing will outperform FLOWTABLE and we can delete it. -- Totus tuus, Glebius.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160528000259.GY58287>