Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 11:41:27 -0700 (PDT) From: Rayson Ho <raysonlogin@yahoo.com> To: A G F Keahan <ak@freenet.co.uk>, "Richard Seaman, Jr." <dick@seaman.org> Cc: Jason Evans <jasone@canonware.com>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Multithreaded server performance Message-ID: <20000427184127.2157.qmail@web804.mail.yahoo.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Both Solaris and NT have good thread implementations: http://www.usenix.org/publications/library/proceedings/usenix-nt98/zabatta.html Read this paper -- There is something about NT threads implementation which has never been released in any books! > the goal is to > do better than NT > (which surprisingly does quite a good job when it > comes to processing > lots of threads). Solaris's threads are pretty > darn good too, but I > dislike all things SystemV-ish, and Solaris/x86 > isn't all that hot > either (compared with the version for the > UltraSPARC). __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Talk to your friends online and get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000427184127.2157.qmail>