Date: Tue, 8 May 2001 00:57:53 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Nuno Teixeira <nuno.mailinglists@pt-quorum.com> Cc: Guilherme Oliveira <guilherme@nortenet.pt>, FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: CFLAGS Optimization Message-ID: <20010508005753.A87660@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20010507235112.P508-100000@gateway.bogus>; from nuno.mailinglists@pt-quorum.com on Mon, May 07, 2001 at 11:55:14PM %2B0100 References: <3AF71796.9C7538AD@nortenet.pt> <20010507235112.P508-100000@gateway.bogus>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 11:55:14PM +0100, Nuno Teixeira wrote: > Hi Guilherme, >=20 > OK. But I'd like to know if I should use CFLAGS in a OS like FreeBSD. I > know that I have good optimizations on Linux, but I don't know if > in FreeBSD is the same, and I'm afraid of putting the FreeBSD stability in > risk. The risk is the same in Linux; they both use gcc, and it's gcc which has the optimizer bugs. It's more common to use absurd gcc optimizations in the Linux community for some reason (perhaps they're used to code misbehaving, so additional brokenness from the gcc doesn't add much ;-) Just Say No. Kris --WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE696cBWry0BWjoQKURAgYpAJ4qSFiAu+9uHfzBTmoyOmK4NYNpJgCgsE3C QjiZy3fYUPJ53ZF/tvH7NIM= =JCt5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010508005753.A87660>