Date: 15 Mar 2001 23:16:25 +0100 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: nate@yogotech.com (Nate Williams) Cc: Adam Laurie <adam@algroup.co.uk>, Ronan Lucio <ronan@melim.com.br>, security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Port 113 Message-ID: <xzp3dceptja.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: Nate Williams's message of "Thu, 15 Mar 2001 15:11:48 -0700 (MST)" References: <006b01c0ad38$39eed0a0$1401a8c0@tedm.placo.com> <099801c0ad7c$75b63800$2aa8a8c0@melim.com.br> <15025.5630.472269.543769@nomad.yogotech.com> <3AB1261F.23B8BE75@algroup.co.uk> <15025.10176.676792.32675@nomad.yogotech.com> <xzpbsr2ptv7.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <15025.15908.270320.373266@nomad.yogotech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com> writes: > Hmm, I remember a long time ago where it was said (urban legend) that > even sending RST's confused older version of mail servers. Huh? Sending an RST results in connect() returning ECONNREFUSED, just like it would if there were no firewall and no identd. Any mail server that can't handle ECONNREFUSED is broken beyond belief. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzp3dceptja.fsf>