Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 20:29:04 -0500 From: Chuck Robey <chuckr@chuckr.org> To: Julian Stacey <jhs@berklix.org> Cc: chat@freebsd.org, "Aryeh M. Friedman" <aryeh.friedman@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Why the FreeBSD license will not be changing Message-ID: <4786C660.40103@chuckr.org> In-Reply-To: <200801101717.m0AHHHmF068362@fire.js.berklix.net> References: <200801101717.m0AHHHmF068362@fire.js.berklix.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Julian Stacey wrote: > Please Discuss Licensing On chat@, Not current@ ! > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > > This is the mailing list for users of freebsd-current. It includes > warnings about new features coming out in -current that will affect > the users, and instructions on steps that must be taken to remain > -current. Anyone running "current" must subscribe to this list. > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat > > This list contains the overflow from the other lists about > non-technical, social information. It includes discussion about > whether Jordan looks like a tune ferret or not, whether or not > to type in capitals, who is drinking too much coffee, where the > best beer is brewed, who is brewing beer in their basement, and > so on. Occasional announcements of important events (such as > upcoming parties, weddings, births, new jobs, etc) can be made > to the technical lists, but the follow ups should be directed to > this list. what wee need is a rule, that if you demand folks should move the thread to such-and-such a list, that YOU ACTUALLY DO THAT. I will admit, Julian, you came closest, you at least posted to -chat, would have been pretty good, if only you'd removed -current before you sent it. Why do folks always insist on the other fellow do what you won't do? I mean, it's not embarrassing, it should be easy to do, shouldn't it? But there's been about a half-dozen or more requests on this very thread, to move it to -chat, but no-one seems able to do it. Huh? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHhsZgz62J6PPcoOkRAursAJ9AEhS8c+loBT684IsL4mQYF6CMlACfV8z/ uyB1mCbzsnbV4oGvFC9SBZk= =pXAQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4786C660.40103>