Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 21:18:35 -0600 (MDT) From: Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com> To: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group <Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca> Cc: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.ca>, Rudy Rucker <rudy@pollo.monkeybrains.net>, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CVS Commits (was: Re: ** HEADS UP ** /dev/[u]random file changes.) Message-ID: <200005110318.VAA14579@nomad.yogotech.com> In-Reply-To: <200005110146.e4B1khL05225@cwsys.cwsent.com> References: <3.0.5.32.20000510143910.02904cc0@marble.sentex.ca> <200005110146.e4B1khL05225@cwsys.cwsent.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > >I got the same failures last night. Is it common to make commits to the > > >-stable branch without attempting a build? > > > > > >Don't get my tone wrong, I'm just curious about the FreeBSD > > >development process. > > > > I track it fairly often and no, its not common. More common are people > > getting caught in the middle of a large commit and they dont get all the > > bits. But even that is quite rare when you compare it to the amount of > > times the process works without issue. > > <Wishful thinking mode> > > Too bad CVS doesn't commit atomically. > > </Wishful thinking mode> Actually, CVS run over the net is pretty close, but it's still not as good as other SCCS software. Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200005110318.VAA14579>