Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 02 May 2007 10:57:39 +0200
From:      Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr>
To:        freebsd-database@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD database performance via JDBC
Message-ID:  <f19jqa$b5u$1@sea.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <4635B9B4.3060905@nagafix.co.uk>
References:  <4635B9B4.3060905@nagafix.co.uk>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

[-- Attachment #1 --]
Antoine Martin wrote:
> I published this paper a few weeks ago that some of you might find
> interesting (see part2: FreeBSD vs Linux vs Solaris):
> http://devloop.org.uk/documentation/database-performance/
> I have to admit I have been a Linux user for many years and I was
> expecting it to come out on top, and if anything I expected Solaris to
> do better - after all the tests are written in Java. All my predictions
> turned out wrong!
> Feel free to forward to [advocacy], re-use the graphs, etc.

Can you try it again with libthr threading library 
(http://threads.seas.gwu.edu/cgi-bin/man2web?program=libmap.conf&section=5)? 
There's intent to make libthr the default for 7.0 and it may perform 
worse in exactly this kind of benchmarks.


[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGOFKKldnAQVacBcgRAv2KAKCDA142ny8i5/LrZPbCETB5VU/UCQCgr+t8
7Oj5uF7s/obHrNtGb9SGmD4=
=/dDp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
help

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?f19jqa$b5u$1>