Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 28 Feb 2006 00:56:31 +0100
From:      Albert Shih <shih@math.jussieu.fr>
To:        Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Danny Butroyd <danny@g-mapps.com>
Subject:   Re: nfs woes in FreeBSD 6.0
Message-ID:  <20060227235631.GC2964@math.jussieu.fr>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.3.4.0.20060227095704.085300c8@64.7.153.2>
References:  <4402F009.1000407@g-mapps.com> <6.2.3.4.0.20060227093542.086c56c0@64.7.153.2> <44031194.8000300@g-mapps.com> <6.2.3.4.0.20060227095704.085300c8@64.7.153.2>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
 Le 27/02/2006 à 10:18:07-0500, Mike Tancsa a écrit
> At 09:49 AM 27/02/2006, Danny Butroyd wrote:
> >I have tried both tcp and udp mounts and have the same issues, the
> >version of nfs is v3 (the default I believe).
> >
> >Is it possible to implement any of the NFS changes/tweaks on my current
> >version?
> 
> Not really as there are many changes behind the scenes that impact 
> it. Its not just the nfsd binary that has changed.  There are a lot 
> of kernel stuff in support of it that has changed.
> 
> BTW, if you are using tcp mounts, and you have devices not on the 
> same subnet,  setting
> net.inet.tcp.inflight.enable=0
> helps with performance.  However, this is a separate issue to the 
> problems you are seeing.

Is there any documentation to explain a newbie like me all (I mean really
all of them) sysctl variable ?

For example what 

	 net.inet.tcp.inflight.enable=0

change ? What's purpose of this variable ?

Lots of thanks.

Regards.


--
Albert SHIH
Universite de Paris 7 (Denis DIDEROT)
U.F.R. de Mathematiques.
7 ième étage, plateau D, bureau 10
Heure local/Local time:
Tue Feb 28 00:55:00 CET 2006



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060227235631.GC2964>