Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2006 01:47:38 +0400 (MSD) From: Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru> To: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/20861: libc_r does not honor socket timeouts Message-ID: <20060419014445.I73773@mp2.macomnet.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0604181742170.26624@sea.ntplx.net> References: <200604182133.k3ILXmZp085715@freefall.freebsd.org> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0604181742170.26624@sea.ntplx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 18 Apr 2006, 17:43-0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: > On Tue, 18 Apr 2006, Maxim Konovalov wrote: > > > Synopsis: libc_r does not honor socket timeouts > > > > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed > > State-Changed-By: maxim > > State-Changed-When: Tue Apr 18 21:33:23 UTC 2006 > > State-Changed-Why: > > Superseded by threads/24472. > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=20861 > > And I'll close threads/24472 because it has been superceded by > libpthread and libthr unless you have other plans for it. Yep, I wonder about libc_r PRs state. We need to decide actually what and when we are going to do with them. Kill them all right now? -- Maxim Konovalov
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060419014445.I73773>