Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2015 19:10:34 +0200 From: Dan Partelly <dan_partelly@rdsor.ro> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: libXO-ification - Why - and is it a symptom of deeper issues? Message-ID: <702A1341-FB0C-41FA-AB95-F84858A7B3A4@rdsor.ro> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-Vmokfo_BGWji9TrgQ40oRxqht9-2iEZVon7aQxR_93Ufxyg@mail.gmail.com> References: <0650CA79-5711-44BF-AC3F-0C5C5B6E5BD9@rdsor.ro> <CAJ-Vmokfo_BGWji9TrgQ40oRxqht9-2iEZVon7aQxR_93Ufxyg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Meaning, is that simple to push things in head , if somone does the work, even with with no proper review of the problem at hand , and the proposed solutions ? > On 15 Nov 2015, at 19:05, Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > The reason is simple - someone offered to do the work and push it through. > > This isn't a commercial thing where we get to make project decisions > and allocate resources - the juniper folk came up with a solution that > they're using and willing to push forward in freebsd. It's been an > interesting experiment and maybe it shouldn't have been done in -HEAD, > but it isn't all that pervasive and we've gotten good feedback from it > all. > > > -adrian > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?702A1341-FB0C-41FA-AB95-F84858A7B3A4>