Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2018 23:06:13 +0000 From: Manish Jain <bourne.identity@hotmail.com> To: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>, FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Fwd: A request for unnested UFS implementation in MBR Message-ID: <VI1PR02MB12002740C49F801A16677D07F6460@VI1PR02MB1200.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com> In-Reply-To: <2449a381-01db-a0b7-a306-cbadf35fb504@yandex.com> References: <98201d37-2d65-34c6-969e-c9649f1a3ab1@yandex.com> <f57a5540-9736-53bf-5312-166a1b2e23b0@yandex.com> <20180707231908.65a2e973.freebsd@edvax.de> <a09d56e5-38c7-bc52-dc92-49d5956e152d@yandex.com> <20180708001336.4097d20e.freebsd@edvax.de> <6bbfdaad-6872-1a6b-f176-471e57ac8d0a@yandex.com> <20180708004645.5a39c930.freebsd@edvax.de> <2449a381-01db-a0b7-a306-cbadf35fb504@yandex.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 07/08/18 04:21, Manish Jain wrote: > Then how do the 'a' and 'c' partitions get accommodated in GPT ? > > Poly, your thinking is wrong. The BSD schema served its purpose. Now, we > should think about retiring it. Or at least, provide it as only an > option to conform with past behaviour. But definitely not as a matter of > forced usage. All this arises from the central desire: I want to be able to create a UFS partition with gpart. But I can't - if the partitioning schema is MBR. -- Thank you & Regards, Manish Jain
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?VI1PR02MB12002740C49F801A16677D07F6460>