Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 13:48:00 +0200 From: Stijn Hoop <stijn@win.tue.nl> To: Alexey Zelkin <phantom@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org, wosch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: when are the ports pages on the web updated? Message-ID: <20020419134800.C56015@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> In-Reply-To: <20020418204618.A59516@ark.cris.net>; from phantom@freebsd.org on Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 08:46:18PM %2B0300 References: <20020418164714.I56757@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> <20020418204618.A59516@ark.cris.net>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 08:46:18PM +0300, Alexey Zelkin wrote: > On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 04:47:14PM +0200, Stijn Hoop wrote: > > I was just notified of a strange 'problem' with the ports webpages > > by someone who was searching for the blackbox maintainer. To witness, > > do this: > > > > - Go to: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi?query=blackbox&stype=all > > and check that the maintainer appears to be 'patseal@hyperhost.net' > > This is strange, because the port has listed me (stijn@win.tue.nl) as a > > maintainer since at least 20 feb. 2002. > > Also note that this port appears to be at version 0.61.1. > > ports.cgi is operates on some snapshot of ports/INDEX file. By > default now using 4.5-RELEASE's INDEX. To get more recent > information on ports you need to choose -STABLE's INDEX at least. > > Actually I think it's not correct and will change default search > criteria to -STABLE's one. Thanks! I think it makes a lot more sense if the sources you download match the port version :) --Stijn -- What would this sentence be like if it weren't self-referential? [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE8wAPwY3r/tLQmfWcRAjDmAJ46Ew1E55oY4Jhdi0exJUfbd2Y0/gCfdHiJ iJLbHq+vFBb7y4TwheCW09s= =FWqp -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020419134800.C56015>