Date: Mon, 10 Apr 1995 13:27:16 -0400 (EDT) From: jfieber@cs.smith.edu (John Fieber) To: paul@isl.cf.ac.uk (Paul Richards) Cc: jfieber@freefall.cdrom.com, CVS-commiters@freefall.cdrom.com, cvs-share@freefall.cdrom.com Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/FAQ/SGML adminman.sgml infosources.sgml Message-ID: <199504101727.NAA08267@grendel.csc.smith.edu> In-Reply-To: <199504101400.PAA25249@isl.cf.ac.uk> from "Paul Richards" at Apr 10, 95 03:00:29 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Paul Richards writes:
> > Log:
> > HTML versions of the SGML documents. These are intended to be
> > accessed through the index.html file in the parent directroy.
> This is very bad. If there's no way to automatically generate the HTML
> files from the SGML sources during *installation* then we'll have to
> re-think the whole setup. This will just lead to inconsistencies between the
> two formats and wastes a lot of space.
Indeed. Having it build during the install involves to pieces
that are not in the tree:
1) Sgmls and sgmlsasp: an sgml parser. This is an easy
out-of-the-box compile.
2) The linuxdoc DTD, asp replacemet files and the sgmlformat
perl script. There is a fair amount of cruft to be removed
from this before anybody would let it near. One binary
is involved but I plan to absorb its functionality in
the perl script.
-john
=== jfieber@cs.smith.edu ================================================
=================================== Come up and be a kite! --K. Bush ===
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199504101727.NAA08267>