Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 14:00:41 +0100 From: RW <fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: flash Message-ID: <20070702140041.0ed62904@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <200707011937.57100.freebsd@dfwlp.com> References: <54357.74.64.6.149.1183317914.squirrel@mail.el.net> <18056.11717.973968.984604@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <20070702011717.47687ee9@gumby.homeunix.com.> <200707011937.57100.freebsd@dfwlp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 1 Jul 2007 19:37:56 -0500 Jonathan Horne <freebsd@dfwlp.com> wrote: > On Sunday 01 July 2007 19:17:17 RW wrote: > > On Sun, 1 Jul 2007 18:42:13 -0400 > > > > Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com> wrote: > > > RW writes: > > > > If you install www/nspluginwrapper, and follow the > > > > instructions, the flash plugin will work with native firefox > > > > and opera browsers. > > > > > > This is flash-9, and not flash-7? > > > > Yes > > _______________________________________________ > i just re-tried the flash9 after having switched back to 7 a long > time ago, and for me, its still quite unstable. opera crashed > quickly for me. Do you actually mean that Opera itself crashed? I've not seen that. Was that with nspluginwrapper or linuxpluginwrapper? I removed the latter when I switched to nspluginwrapper. Flash 9 doesn't work very well, but with nspluginwrapper it works no worse in the native browsers than in Linux versions. The problem with Flash7 is that it works mainly with youtube and similar sites, and with irritating adverts. So if you don't much use youtube, it's worse than nothing. It wont work with sites that use flash for navigation.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070702140041.0ed62904>