Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 08:38:59 -0400 From: Ken Smith <kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src UPDATING src/sys/netgraph netgraph.h ng_message.h src/sys/netgraph/bluetooth/include ng_btsocket.h Message-ID: <20040820123859.GC1196@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> In-Reply-To: <20040820081918.GC27365@ip.net.ua> References: <200408200124.i7K1ONcF095627@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040820081918.GC27365@ip.net.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 11:19:18AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> We need to be careful with using "MFC" now. What does it mean, RELENG_5,
> RELENG_4, or both? ;)
This problem will continue for a while too unfortunately. :-(
If all goes as planned (which it never seems to...) shortly after the
5.X release RELENG_5 becomes -stable. HEAD as always will be -current.
But RELENG_4 will still be an active development branch and the target
of at least some normal developer-generated commits until we release
4.11. After 4.11 is released the current plan is to turn over RELENG_4
(as well as RELENG_4_11) to so@ and it becomes an Errata Branch.
So, after the 4.11 release we'll be back to the normal terminology
being adequate but until then it's gonna be a bit weird... :-(
--
Ken Smith
- From there to here, from here to | kensmith@cse.buffalo.edu
there, funny things are everywhere. |
- Theodore Geisel |
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040820123859.GC1196>