Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 2 May 2003 18:35:49 +0100
From:      David Malone <dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie>
To:        Melvyn Sopacua <freebsd-stable@webteckies.org>
Cc:        FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: IPv6 Resolver (or: Slow rendering of Webpages using Konqueror)
Message-ID:  <20030502173549.GA10527@walton.maths.tcd.ie>
In-Reply-To: <200305021803.18757.freebsd-stable@webteckies.org>
References:  <200305021105.h42B5p1G012593@drugs.dv.isc.org> <200305021803.18757.freebsd-stable@webteckies.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Fri, May 02, 2003 at 06:03:18PM +0200, Melvyn Sopacua wrote:
> Let's keep the  flaming part to a minimum. I sent an email to DoubleClick 
> regarding the issue, and my support contact has forwarded the email to the 
> Networking guys and will follow up on it (and if he doesn't I will).
> So essentially, we're working on the same end of the problem.

Yay! I've mailed them about this before and never got a response
from them. I was pretty polite with them, and pointed out that the
problem caused their ads to be missed by my users. Since I got no
response I just set up my nameserver to think it was authorititive
for doubleclick.net and give it an empty zone, so lookups are much
faster now. >-)

> My _personal_ opinion, is that it's just plain dumb, that these 'loadbalancing
> cowboys' can tie up system resources for such a lengthly period of time and a 
> systems' administrator can do nothing about it, but patch applications.
> 
> Imagine the implications, when your mailserver is presented with a bunch of 
> 'MAIL FROM: foo@doubleclick.net'...

Unfortunately, anyone with a non responding name server (v4 or v6,
transport or records) generates a very similar looking problem, if
DNS lookups in your service/application are single threaded.

	David.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030502173549.GA10527>