Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 12:36:37 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Adam <bsdx@looksharp.net> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: a better idea for package dependencies Message-ID: <20000509123637.A66034@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0005091516310.11996-100000@turtle.looksharp.net>; from bsdx@looksharp.net on Tue, May 09, 2000 at 03:24:25PM -0400 References: <20000509102912.D28677@dragon.nuxi.com> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0005091516310.11996-100000@turtle.looksharp.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, May 09, 2000 at 03:24:25PM -0400, Adam wrote: > I cant comment on the complexity of registering a port as an installed > package because I havent read the code, but it doesnt look too complex > according to whats in /var/db/pkg... perhaps more makefile things could > be done to register a package. I am seeing +COMMENT +CONTENTS > +DESC in a simple port dir, and if it depends on other things, > +REQUIRED_BY... thinking optimistically that this stuff could be > acheived with simple commands like echo myport >> > /var/db/foo/+REQUIRED_BY, and maybe grep to help with removing things > from REQ... PLEASE get a CLUE about pkg_* and ports BEFORE commenting further. -- -- David (obrien@NUXI.com) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000509123637.A66034>