Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2019 15:30:35 -0800 From: "Simon J. Gerraty" <sjg@juniper.net> To: Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com> Cc: <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org>, <arch@freebsd.org>, <sjg@juniper.net> Subject: Re: Importing mksh in base Message-ID: <79948.1548545435@kaos.jnpr.net> In-Reply-To: <D43F06EE-A6A9-4F7D-BF81-8EC2298F86C9@cschubert.com> References: <20190125165751.kpcjjncmf7j7maxd@ivaldir.net> <D43F06EE-A6A9-4F7D-BF81-8EC2298F86C9@cschubert.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com> wrote: > Why not ksh93 instead? It is the original and authoritative Korn > shell. EPL i Sure but my experience was (back in maybe 2000 or there abouts) it was lame compared to pdksh ;-) emacs mode as crude, no interactive history search. > As to replacing root's shell, replacing tcsh is a large POLA > violation. Maybe give users the option at install time instead. Yes - netbsd have done that for years, no need to surprise/upset anyone.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?79948.1548545435>