Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2010 21:49:48 +0000 From: "b. f." <bf1783@googlemail.com> To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Cc: gerald@FreeBSD.org, Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie@le-hen.org> Subject: Re: Add -lssp_nonshared to GCC's LIB_SPEC unconditionally Message-ID: <AANLkTi=X6cSErnPQ%2BoLbBhifRiK_Os2z58a6YxFwK2i5@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue Aug 3 15:22:00 UTC 2010, Jeremie Le Hen wrote: ... >I therefore propose the following change to always link in >libssp_nonshared.a. I think this change is harmless when the symbol is >not needed in one of the objects linked together since the linker won't >pull in the library member "ssp-local.o" in the target object. Will this do the right thing when the base system is built WITHOUT_SSP? How about the case of WITHOUT_DYNAMICROOT/NOSHARED/NO_SHARED=yes, with and without this change? Are changes to the specs of the lang/gcc* ports needed? What about clang? b.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTi=X6cSErnPQ%2BoLbBhifRiK_Os2z58a6YxFwK2i5>