Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 19 Jan 1999 15:13:20 -0500 (EST)
From:      spork <spork@super-g.com>
To:        Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org>
Cc:        Greg Pavelcak <gpavelcak@philos.umass.edu>, freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Overclocking Celeron 300A
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.00.9901191145410.7292-100000@super-g.inch.com>
In-Reply-To: <19990119144126.B905@cons.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I noticed tomshardware.com has no "how to overclock your 300A".  I did
note that there are some notes about Intel putting a stop to overclocking
by locking the chip at one speed.  Anyone have the lowdown on this?  I
need a new machine at home, and I'm seeing the Celeron and the AMD K6-2
coming really close in price.  If it's possible to reliably clock the
celeron, that seems like a good deal...  Anyone able to clarify the
rumors?

Thanks,

Charles

---
Charles Sprickman
spork@super-g.com

On Tue, 19 Jan 1999, Martin Cracauer wrote:

> I overclocked a 300A to various speed and various voltages between 2.0
> and 2.2 Volts in an Asus P2B.
> 
> On 450MHz (2.2 Volts) it runs Windows, Games etc. but it does not
> survive a FreeBSD make world, the hardest test on my plate. Most
> overclocking advocates do not test that hard, and this frequency might
> be stable enough for operating system that crash more often than the
> overclocked hardware, but it just isn't 100% reliable.
> 
> Having said this, at 375MHz/2.0 (0.83 MHz on Busx4.5) volts I could do
> whatever I want and it is stable. I truely beleive that these Chips
> are designed for higher frequencies than 300 MHz.
> 
> I can also confirm that a Celeron with 128 MB cache at full speed is
> the same speed as a PII with 512KB cache half speed at the same
> frequency for tests like games, FreeBSD compilation etc.
> 
> The real problem with the Celerons is that I can't get any descent
> material to mount it on my P2B.
> 
> Also, all the people who got PPROs 200 in 1996 overclocked them, but
> most began to fail after one year of continuous operation, so prepare
> to buy a new chip someday. On the other hand, it is easily imagineable
> that these Celeron 300 are really higher clockable chips, given that
> Intel produces similar chips with up to 450 MHz, while a PPRO 200 was
> top of list at that time.
> 
> Martin
> -- 
> %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
> Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org> http://www.cons.org/cracauer/
> BSD User Group Hamburg, Germany     http://www.bsdhh.org/
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
> 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.00.9901191145410.7292-100000>