Date: 25 Mar 1999 16:15:56 +0100 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no> To: Luigi Rizzo <luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> Cc: bde@zeta.org.au (Bruce Evans), mike@smith.net.au, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, luigi@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet ip_dummynet.c Message-ID: <xzpg16tzjkj.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: Luigi Rizzo's message of "Thu, 25 Mar 1999 08:23:27 %2B0100 (MET)" References: <199903250723.IAA12325@labinfo.iet.unipi.it>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Luigi Rizzo <luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> writes: > I understand that name space pollution issues do not leave the option > of having all "opt_*" included in "opt_global.h" unless we standardize names > in a way that reduces conflicts... So should we go for that, e.g. having > > OPT_* for generic options > DEV_* for devices > > and so on ? It's not just namespace pollution. If you pack everything into opt_global.h, you'll get a lot of false-negative up-to-date checks, and your kernel will take longer than necessary to build after minor configuration modifications. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpg16tzjkj.fsf>