Date: Sun, 17 May 2015 16:12:15 -0500 From: Leif Pedersen <bilbo@hobbiton.org> To: Roger Marquis <marquis@roble.com> Cc: "freebsd-security@freebsd.org" <freebsd-security@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Forums.FreeBSD.org - SSL Issue? Message-ID: <CAK-wPOgX3mi0Hvk3e9qLMCVwJ%2B3-BKRPu7jCHrJ-MH=e831Mww@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20150517205035.5F0DD154@hub.freebsd.org> References: <CACRVPYOALi-V8D34zeJTYdSwHshYrqtttqVV3=aP8Yb6ZAxfyg@mail.gmail.com> <2857899F-802E-4086-AD41-DD76FACD44FB@modirum.com> <05636D22-BBC3-4A15-AC44-0F39FB265CDF@patpro.net> <20150514193706.V69409@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <F2460C80-969A-46DF-A44F-6C3D381ABDC3@patpro.net> <5554879D.7060601@obluda.cz> <1431697272.3528812.269632617.29548DB0@webmail.messagingengine.com> <5556E5DC.7090809@obluda.cz> <1431894012.1947726.271026057.54BB4786@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20150517205035.5F0DD154@hub.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 3:50 PM, Roger Marquis <marquis@roble.com> wrote: > I recommended an openssl_base port so that > security vulnerabilities (not necessarily protocol weaknesses) could be > more easily remediated (than installworld) and so 'pkg audit' could > report on those. > Exactly how would that differ from using freebsd-update? -- As implied by email protocols, the information in this message is not confidential. Any middle-man or recipient may inspect, modify, copy, forward, reply to, delete, or filter email for any purpose unless said parties are otherwise obligated. As the sender, I acknowledge that I have a lower expectation of the control and privacy of this message than I would a post-card. Further, nothing in this message is legally binding without cryptographic evidence of its integrity. http://bilbo.hobbiton.org/wiki/Eat_My_Sig
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAK-wPOgX3mi0Hvk3e9qLMCVwJ%2B3-BKRPu7jCHrJ-MH=e831Mww>