Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 11:01:52 -0800 From: David Johnson <djohnson@acuson.com> To: Doug Young <dougy@gargoyle.apana.org.au> Cc: FreeBSD-newbies <freebsd-newbies@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Enough is enough (emacs vs vi) Message-ID: <3AAD1D20.48F149B1@acuson.com> References: <Pine.GSO.4.30.0103100913330.10006-100000@corten8> <00ed01c0aa0c$c386e160$0200a8c0@apana.org.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Doug Young wrote: > > I've always wondered why whoever it was that developed VI had to make > it so obtuse ... Obtuse? Maybe I'm dating myself, but I can remember the day when vi was considered to be very user friendly. At one time, line editors were all there were. Even DOS had only edlin once upon a time. Compared to what was available, vi was a breath of fresh air. Most terminals back then had only alphanumerics and ESC. No ALT, no CTRL, no arrow keys. Which is why you use hjkl to move around and have to switch between editing and command modes. If the all of the terminals back them had Meta keys I'm sure Bill Joy (the whoever it was) would have used them to make it simpler. David To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-newbies" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3AAD1D20.48F149B1>